WEKO3
-
RootNode
アイテム
熊十力の仏教唯識学批判
http://hdl.handle.net/10112/12582
http://hdl.handle.net/10112/125822c5bc145-1e32-4fa4-af1d-a132ae9f00b3
| 名前 / ファイル | ライセンス | アクション |
|---|---|---|
KU-0400-20040401-02.pdf (1.4 MB)
|
|
| Item type | 紀要論文 / Departmental Bulletin Paper(1) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 公開日 | 2018-02-28 | |||||
| タイトル | ||||||
| タイトル | 熊十力の仏教唯識学批判 | |||||
| 言語 | ||||||
| 言語 | jpn | |||||
| 資源タイプ | ||||||
| 資源タイプ識別子 | http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 | |||||
| 資源タイプ | departmental bulletin paper | |||||
| その他のタイトル | ||||||
| その他のタイトル | Criticisms of Consciousness-Only Buddhism by Xiong shili | |||||
| 著者 |
郭, 斉勇
× 郭, 斉勇× 吾妻, 重二 |
|||||
| 著者別名 | ||||||
| 識別子Scheme | WEKO | |||||
| 識別子 | 4070 | |||||
| 姓名 | Guo, Qiyong | |||||
| 著者別名 | ||||||
| 識別子Scheme | WEKO | |||||
| 識別子 | 4071 | |||||
| 姓名 | Azuma, Juji | |||||
| 概要 | ||||||
| 内容記述タイプ | Other | |||||
| 内容記述 | The controversy on 'Xin Weishi-lun' between Xiong shili and the scholars in Consciousness-Only School was a highlight in the modern history of Chinese thought. The first focus of the controversy was the question of 'Xingjue' and 'Xingji' on Xingti (the essence of the Buddha-nature). With 'Xingji' as the premise of the Consciousness-Only School, they emphasized on the study of 'zhuanyi' to escape from impurity. On the other hand, Xiong shili took the position of 'Xingjue' and thought that Xingti was not 'empty' but 'substantial' and 'dayong (great function)' directly drived from 'ti (substance)'. Thus he argued that Xingti could be the principle to create cultures. The second focus was the question of Xinti (the premise of the mind). Xiong Shili argued that Xinti had a total and organic consistence, and criticized that the Consciousness-Only School divided the mind into fragments. This argument was based on the fundamental position of Xiong shili's philosophy that the function of the mind was not a complicated and detailed thing but an active, simple and direct thing. But, objectively, his criticism of the school was not necessarily to the point. It was rather a creative 'misinterpretation'. His way of thinking remarkably showed the characteristics of Huayan Buddhism and Zen Buddhism, especially of Song-Ming Neo-Confucianism. In other words, he claimed the supremacy and the activeness of the moral character from the perspective of 'tiyong-buer'. It was a logical result that he didn't advocate the philosophy of emptiness based on the 'yuanqi' (theory of arisal through causation). | |||||
| 内容記述 | ||||||
| 内容記述タイプ | Other | |||||
| 内容記述 | 原著：郭斉勇、翻訳：吾妻重二 | |||||
| 書誌情報 |
関西大学東西学術研究所紀要 巻 37, p. 39-56, 発行日 2004-04-01 |
|||||
| ISSN | ||||||
| 収録物識別子タイプ | ISSN | |||||
| 収録物識別子 | 02878151 | |||||
| 書誌レコードID | ||||||
| 収録物識別子タイプ | NCID | |||||
| 収録物識別子 | AN0004709X | |||||
| 著者版フラグ | ||||||
| 出版タイプ | VoR | |||||
| 出版タイプResource | http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85 | |||||
| 出版者 | ||||||
| 出版者 | 関西大学東西学術研究所 | |||||
| キーワード | ||||||
| 主題Scheme | Other | |||||
| 主題 | 関西大学 | |||||
| キーワード | ||||||
| 主題Scheme | Other | |||||
| 主題 | Kansai University | |||||
