WEKO3
アイテム
近代日本における海員審判の意義と限界 : 船舶事故調査の視点から
http://hdl.handle.net/10112/13266
http://hdl.handle.net/10112/132663d3e6564-c5b9-4ee8-accf-5d50e96a1ed9
| 名前 / ファイル | ライセンス | アクション |
|---|---|---|
KU-1100-20180331-04.pdf (2.4 MB)
|
|
| アイテムタイプ | 紀要論文 / Departmental Bulletin Paper(1) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 公開日 | 2018-04-17 | |||||
| タイトル | ||||||
| タイトル | 近代日本における海員審判の意義と限界 : 船舶事故調査の視点から | |||||
| 言語 | ||||||
| 言語 | jpn | |||||
| 資源タイプ | ||||||
| 資源タイプ識別子 | http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 | |||||
| 資源タイプ | departmental bulletin paper | |||||
| その他のタイトル | ||||||
| その他のタイトル | Significance and limitation of Seamen's disciplinary inquiry in the early modern Japan from the viewpoint of shipping casualty investigation | |||||
| 著者 |
大須賀, 英郎
× 大須賀, 英郎× 安部, 誠治 |
|||||
| 著者別名 | ||||||
| 識別子Scheme | WEKO | |||||
| 識別子 | 21945 | |||||
| 姓名 | Osuga, Hideo | |||||
| 著者別名 | ||||||
| 識別子Scheme | WEKO | |||||
| 識別子 | 21946 | |||||
| 姓名 | Abe, Seiji | |||||
| 概要 | ||||||
| 内容記述タイプ | Other | |||||
| 内容記述 | The origin of the Japanese shipping casualty investigation system can be traced back to 1876, when the regulation stipulating the license for masters and engineers was introduced after the European maritime systems. This was developed into a maritime disciplinary tribunal system for seamen in 1896. This system served also for casualty investigation to a limited extent. Since it had a specific focus on the seamen's behavior, the coverage of the investigation on the significant marine casualties was unsatisfactorily low and lacked in the notion of prevention of recurrence. Although it had a certain role in preventing significant fault or violation of regulations, judging from today's standard, the maritime disciplinary tribunal system did not fulfil most of the requirements of the shipping casualty investigation. The Titanic casualty and its subsequent investigation report in England had a significant impact on the Japanese shipping community as well, encouraging criticisms on the 1896 disciplinary system. The formal investigation in England served as a good example, which brought about a lot of new safety knowledge and system improvements. The critics, including Niichiro Matsunami and Kiyoshi Mori argued that a new casualty investigation system with the specific purpose of marine casualty prevention, should be set up and replace the old one. The drafts of new legislation were made twice, but a new law had never come into being before 1947. The Maritime Casualty Tribunal established in 1947 was intended to remedy the shortcomings of its predecessors. The 1947 system's role and limitations will be dealt with in a separate article by the same author. | |||||
| 書誌情報 |
社会安全学研究 = Journal of societal safety sciences 巻 8, p. 19-42, 発行日 2018-03-31 |
|||||
| ISSN | ||||||
| 収録物識別子タイプ | ISSN | |||||
| 収録物識別子 | 21860815 | |||||
| 書誌レコードID | ||||||
| 収録物識別子タイプ | NCID | |||||
| 収録物識別子 | AA12523726 | |||||
| 著者版フラグ | ||||||
| 出版タイプ | VoR | |||||
| 出版タイプResource | http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85 | |||||
| 出版者 | ||||||
| 出版者 | 関西大学 社会安全研究センター | |||||
| キーワード | ||||||
| 主題Scheme | Other | |||||
| 主題 | Shipping casualty investigation | |||||
| キーワード | ||||||
| 主題Scheme | Other | |||||
| 主題 | Maritime disciplinary tribunal system | |||||
| キーワード | ||||||
| 主題Scheme | Other | |||||
| 主題 | Prevention of recurrence | |||||
| キーワード | ||||||
| 主題Scheme | Other | |||||
| 主題 | Titanic casualty report | |||||
| キーワード | ||||||
| 主題Scheme | Other | |||||
| 主題 | Niichiro Matsunami | |||||
| キーワード | ||||||
| 主題Scheme | Other | |||||
| 主題 | Kansai University | |||||
| キーワード | ||||||
| 主題Scheme | Other | |||||
| 主題 | 関西大学 | |||||
