{"created":"2023-05-15T12:19:26.481291+00:00","id":9706,"links":{},"metadata":{"_buckets":{"deposit":"01885bc7-05a3-478d-b417-1ae1e5add4d9"},"_deposit":{"created_by":1,"id":"9706","owners":[1],"pid":{"revision_id":0,"type":"depid","value":"9706"},"status":"published"},"_oai":{"id":"oai:kansai-u.repo.nii.ac.jp:00009706","sets":["528:1385:1436"]},"author_link":["19544","19545"],"item_9_alternative_title_20":{"attribute_name":"その他のタイトル","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_alternative_title":"Guidelines for Advancing Japanese Family Sociology from Methodological  Points of View: A Quantitative  Researcher's Propositions"}]},"item_9_biblio_info_7":{"attribute_name":"書誌情報","attribute_value_mlt":[{"bibliographicIssueDates":{"bibliographicIssueDate":"2011-10-31","bibliographicIssueDateType":"Issued"},"bibliographicIssueNumber":"2","bibliographicPageEnd":"169","bibliographicPageStart":"161","bibliographicVolumeNumber":"23","bibliographic_titles":[{"bibliographic_title":"家族社会学研究"}]}]},"item_9_description_4":{"attribute_name":"概要","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_description":"本稿の目的は，過去20年の日本の家族社会学研究を回顧することで，その方法論的な発展指針を探ることである．1989～2010年を三つの時期に区分して，『家族社会学研究』の234件の論文にみられるトレンドを分析した．分析の結果，以下の点が明らかになった．（１）実証的研究の割合は着実に増加している．（２）問題家族の研究を中心に質的研究が増加しており，量的研究は一般家族の研究への集中傾向を強めている．（３）量的研究の中では、全国無作為サンプルがⅡ期以降3分の1以上を占め，多変量解析がⅢ期に8割に達するなどの発展を示している．（４）一方で，面接調査が減少し，高度な分析技法の普及は停滞している．量的研究と質的研究の関係，家族研究に携わる他の学問分野との関係について議論を行い，NFRJを軸とする共同研究の発展を提案した．\nIn this paper, I explored guidelines for advancing methodologies in Japanese family sociology by reviewing research over the past twenty years. I analyzed 234 articles in the Japanese Journal of Family Sociology and showed changes over three distinct periods from 1989 to 2010. The results were as followings: (1) The proportion of empirical studies increased steadily. (2)The amount of qualitative research conducted increased for investigations concerning families with serious problems; in contrast,quantitative research came to concentrate on studies involving nonproblematic families. (3) Quantitative research methods advanced in certain respects: the proportion of research based on nation wide samples reached one third of quantitative research in the second period, and about eighty percent of quantitative research came to use multivariate analyses in the third period. (4)On the other hand,the number of face-to-face interviews decreased, and highly advanced statistical analytical methods were hardly used. Lastly, I discussed how quantitative and qualitative research should be related to each other, and how we should relate to other academic societies involved in family studies. I, then proposed ways to activate NFRJ for more collaborative studies.","subitem_description_type":"Other"}]},"item_9_full_name_3":{"attribute_name":"著者別名","attribute_value_mlt":[{"nameIdentifiers":[{"nameIdentifier":"19545","nameIdentifierScheme":"WEKO"}],"names":[{"name":"Yasuda, Tokio"}]}]},"item_9_publisher_34":{"attribute_name":"出版者","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_publisher":"日本家族社会学会"}]},"item_9_source_id_8":{"attribute_name":"ISSN","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_source_identifier":"0916328X","subitem_source_identifier_type":"ISSN"}]},"item_9_version_type_17":{"attribute_name":"著者版フラグ","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_version_resource":"http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85","subitem_version_type":"VoR"}]},"item_creator":{"attribute_name":"著者","attribute_type":"creator","attribute_value_mlt":[{"creatorNames":[{"creatorName":"保田, 時男"}],"nameIdentifiers":[{"nameIdentifier":"19544","nameIdentifierScheme":"WEKO"},{"nameIdentifier":"70388388","nameIdentifierScheme":"e-Rad","nameIdentifierURI":"https://nrid.nii.ac.jp/ja/nrid/1000070388388"}]}]},"item_files":{"attribute_name":"ファイル情報","attribute_type":"file","attribute_value_mlt":[{"accessrole":"open_date","date":[{"dateType":"Available","dateValue":"2019-05-22"}],"displaytype":"detail","filename":"KU-1100-20111031-04.pdf","filesize":[{"value":"6.8 MB"}],"format":"application/pdf","licensetype":"license_note","mimetype":"application/pdf","url":{"label":"KU-1100-20111031-04.pdf","url":"https://kansai-u.repo.nii.ac.jp/record/9706/files/KU-1100-20111031-04.pdf"},"version_id":"a98afe3e-d9c7-4fe6-aabf-652bba91a4f2"}]},"item_keyword":{"attribute_name":"キーワード","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_subject":"家族研究法","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"量的研究","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"質的研究","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"methodology in family research","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"quantitative research","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"qualitative research","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"}]},"item_language":{"attribute_name":"言語","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_language":"jpn"}]},"item_resource_type":{"attribute_name":"資源タイプ","attribute_value_mlt":[{"resourcetype":"journal article","resourceuri":"http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501"}]},"item_title":"方法論から見る日本の家族社会学の発展指針―計量研究者の立場から","item_titles":{"attribute_name":"タイトル","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_title":"方法論から見る日本の家族社会学の発展指針―計量研究者の立場から"}]},"item_type_id":"9","owner":"1","path":["1436"],"pubdate":{"attribute_name":"公開日","attribute_value":"2012-07-13"},"publish_date":"2012-07-13","publish_status":"0","recid":"9706","relation_version_is_last":true,"title":["方法論から見る日本の家族社会学の発展指針―計量研究者の立場から"],"weko_creator_id":"1","weko_shared_id":1},"updated":"2023-05-15T15:54:54.464651+00:00"}