{"created":"2023-05-15T12:18:18.213299+00:00","id":8169,"links":{},"metadata":{"_buckets":{"deposit":"7997af90-ce79-41ef-9e76-427062ec1f9c"},"_deposit":{"created_by":1,"id":"8169","owners":[1],"pid":{"revision_id":0,"type":"depid","value":"8169"},"status":"published"},"_oai":{"id":"oai:kansai-u.repo.nii.ac.jp:00008169","sets":["528:933:953:1215"]},"author_link":["16238","16237","16236","16235"],"item_10_alternative_title_20":{"attribute_name":"その他のタイトル","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_alternative_title":"An Axiomatization of the Imai Solution in Nash Bargaining Problems with the Compact Sets of Alternatives and with a variable Number of Players"}]},"item_10_biblio_info_7":{"attribute_name":"書誌情報","attribute_value_mlt":[{"bibliographicIssueDates":{"bibliographicIssueDate":"2000-03-15","bibliographicIssueDateType":"Issued"},"bibliographicIssueNumber":"4","bibliographicPageEnd":"378","bibliographicPageStart":"353","bibliographicVolumeNumber":"49","bibliographic_titles":[{"bibliographic_title":"關西大學經済論集"}]}]},"item_10_description_4":{"attribute_name":"概要","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_description":"本稿では，ナッシュ交渉問題で，選択肢集合がコンパクトであり，交渉に参加するプレイヤーの数が可変である状況を設定し，Imai解(Imai(1983))，交渉達成度に関する辞書式マクシミン解，の公理化を行う。我々は，Imai解が，不変性，対称性，独立性，最適性，安全性，及び安定性を満足する唯一の交渉解であることを示す（定理3)。これらの公理のうち，前から四つまではNash(1950)のそれらとほぼ同じである。安定性は，Lensberg(1988)のそれと同じ流儀で定義される。この公理は，交渉に参加するプレイヤーの構成が異なる，二つの交渉問題に対して，解は整合的な形で解決を与えなければならないことを要求する。残る一つ，安全性が，本稿で提出する新しい公理である。非凸な選択肢集合を認める場合，Imai解は多価写像となり，プレイヤーが最終的に得る効用に関しては不確実性が存在することになる。本稿では，プレイヤーは，マクシミン的な危険回避行動をとると仮定する。安全性は，この危険回避的なプレイヤーがとる選択行動の一面を表した公理である。","subitem_description_type":"Other"}]},"item_10_full_name_3":{"attribute_name":"著者別名","attribute_value_mlt":[{"nameIdentifiers":[{"nameIdentifier":"16237","nameIdentifierScheme":"WEKO"}],"names":[{"name":"Nagahisa, Ryo-ichi"}]},{"nameIdentifiers":[{"nameIdentifier":"16238","nameIdentifierScheme":"WEKO"}],"names":[{"name":"Tanaka, Makoto"}]}]},"item_10_publisher_34":{"attribute_name":"出版者","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_publisher":"關西大学經済學會"}]},"item_10_relation_43":{"attribute_name":"シリーズ","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_relation_name":[{"subitem_relation_name_text":"経済学文献季報分類番号; 02-21"}]}]},"item_10_source_id_10":{"attribute_name":"書誌レコードID","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_source_identifier":"AN00046869","subitem_source_identifier_type":"NCID"}]},"item_10_source_id_8":{"attribute_name":"ISSN","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_source_identifier":"04497554","subitem_source_identifier_type":"ISSN"}]},"item_10_version_type_17":{"attribute_name":"著者版フラグ","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_version_resource":"http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85","subitem_version_type":"VoR"}]},"item_creator":{"attribute_name":"著者","attribute_type":"creator","attribute_value_mlt":[{"creatorNames":[{"creatorName":"長久, 領壱"}],"nameIdentifiers":[{}]},{"creatorNames":[{"creatorName":"田中, 誠"}],"nameIdentifiers":[{}]}]},"item_files":{"attribute_name":"ファイル情報","attribute_type":"file","attribute_value_mlt":[{"accessrole":"open_date","date":[{"dateType":"Available","dateValue":"2019-05-22"}],"displaytype":"detail","filename":"KU-1100-20000315-04.pdf","filesize":[{"value":"2.4 MB"}],"format":"application/pdf","licensetype":"license_note","mimetype":"application/pdf","url":{"label":"KU-1100-20000315-04.pdf","url":"https://kansai-u.repo.nii.ac.jp/record/8169/files/KU-1100-20000315-04.pdf"},"version_id":"c3f31866-a416-4488-99f3-235908964657"}]},"item_keyword":{"attribute_name":"キーワード","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_subject":"関西大学","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"Kansai University","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"関西大学経済論集","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"交渉ゲーム","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"公理分析","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"危険回避行動","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"マクシミン行動仮説","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"Kalai-Smorodinsky解","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"Lensberg","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"個人間厚生比較","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"}]},"item_language":{"attribute_name":"言語","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_language":"jpn"}]},"item_resource_type":{"attribute_name":"資源タイプ","attribute_value_mlt":[{"resourcetype":"departmental bulletin paper","resourceuri":"http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501"}]},"item_title":"ナッシュ交渉問題におけるImai解の公理化 ; 選択肢集合がコンパクトであり、プレイヤーの数が可変である場合","item_titles":{"attribute_name":"タイトル","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_title":"ナッシュ交渉問題におけるImai解の公理化 ; 選択肢集合がコンパクトであり、プレイヤーの数が可変である場合"}]},"item_type_id":"10","owner":"1","path":["1215"],"pubdate":{"attribute_name":"公開日","attribute_value":"2018-07-10"},"publish_date":"2018-07-10","publish_status":"0","recid":"8169","relation_version_is_last":true,"title":["ナッシュ交渉問題におけるImai解の公理化 ; 選択肢集合がコンパクトであり、プレイヤーの数が可変である場合"],"weko_creator_id":"1","weko_shared_id":-1},"updated":"2023-05-15T19:51:24.067068+00:00"}