WEKO3
アイテム
Standard-Essential Patents and the Japanese Competition Law in Comparison with China, the US and the EU
http://hdl.handle.net/10112/11405
http://hdl.handle.net/10112/114058ec95e11-4741-40d7-a506-ff4cceb5d647
| 名前 / ファイル | ライセンス | アクション |
|---|---|---|
KU-1100-20170815-00.pdf (209.5 kB)
|
|
| Item type | 学術雑誌論文 / Journal Article(1) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 公開日 | 2017-08-24 | |||||
| タイトル | ||||||
| タイトル | Standard-Essential Patents and the Japanese Competition Law in Comparison with China, the US and the EU | |||||
| 言語 | ||||||
| 言語 | eng | |||||
| 資源タイプ | ||||||
| 資源タイプ識別子 | http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 | |||||
| 資源タイプ | journal article | |||||
| 著者 |
Takigawa, Toshiaki
× Takigawa, Toshiaki |
|||||
| 著者別名 | ||||||
| 識別子Scheme | WEKO | |||||
| 識別子 | 6833 | |||||
| 姓名 | 滝川, 敏明 | |||||
| 概要 | ||||||
| 内容記述タイプ | Other | |||||
| 内容記述 | Despite having committed to FRAND (fair, reasonable and nondiscriminatory) terms, not a few standard-essential-patents (SEPs) owners have engaged in holdup (such as suing for injunction,or levying very high royalty), which have triggered antitrust/competition actions in the US, the EU, China, Japan and Korea. This article focuses on the Japanese situation, highlighting its difference with the Chinese one. The Japanese competition agency (JFTC) as well as Japanese IP High Court have closely studied the jurisprudence in the US and the EU, coming up with solutions in line with those adopted by the US and EU courts and agencies. By contrast, Chinese agencies and courts have devised unique methods for tackling SEP/FRAND issues. First, a Chines antimonopoly agency has utilized the exploitative-abuse provision of the Chinese competition law for ordering a SEP owner to reduce its royalties to Chinese licensees, regardless of the SEP owners' FRAND commitment. Second, a Chinese court utilized "non-discriminatory" portion of FRAND commitment, for mandating virtually the same royalty to be levied on Chinese licensees as that levied on Apple. These methods either leave too much latitude to the agencies, or lack a convincing rationale. | |||||
| 書誌情報 |
The Antitrust Bulletin 巻 62, 号 3, p. 483-493, 発行日 2017-08-15 |
|||||
| ISSN | ||||||
| 収録物識別子タイプ | ISSN | |||||
| 収録物識別子 | 0003603X | |||||
| DOI | ||||||
| 関連タイプ | isVersionOf | |||||
| 識別子タイプ | DOI | |||||
| 関連識別子 | 10.1177/0003603X17718683 | |||||
| 権利 | ||||||
| 権利情報 | Copyright (C) 2017 SAGE Publications. Reprinted by permission of SAGE Publications. | |||||
| 著者版フラグ | ||||||
| 出版タイプ | AM | |||||
| 出版タイプResource | http://purl.org/coar/version/c_ab4af688f83e57aa | |||||
| 出版者 | ||||||
| 出版者 | SAGE Publications | |||||
| キーワード | ||||||
| 主題Scheme | Other | |||||
| 主題 | standard-essential-patents | |||||
| キーワード | ||||||
| 主題Scheme | Other | |||||
| 主題 | FRAND | |||||
| キーワード | ||||||
| 主題Scheme | Other | |||||
| 主題 | holdup | |||||
| キーワード | ||||||
| 主題Scheme | Other | |||||
| 主題 | exploitative abuse | |||||
| キーワード | ||||||
| 主題Scheme | Other | |||||
| 主題 | injunction suits | |||||
| キーワード | ||||||
| 主題Scheme | Other | |||||
| 主題 | JFTC | |||||
| キーワード | ||||||
| 主題Scheme | Other | |||||
| 主題 | NDRC | |||||
| キーワード | ||||||
| 主題Scheme | Other | |||||
| 主題 | SAIC | |||||
| キーワード | ||||||
| 主題Scheme | Other | |||||
| 主題 | IP Guidelines | |||||
| キーワード | ||||||
| 主題Scheme | Other | |||||
| 主題 | Qualcomm | |||||
| キーワード | ||||||
| 主題Scheme | Other | |||||
| 主題 | non-assertion-of-patents | |||||
| キーワード | ||||||
| 主題Scheme | Other | |||||
| 主題 | NAP | |||||
| キーワード | ||||||
| 主題Scheme | Other | |||||
| 主題 | Apple v. Samsung | |||||
| キーワード | ||||||
| 主題Scheme | Other | |||||
| 主題 | Huawei v. ZTE | |||||
| キーワード | ||||||
| 主題Scheme | Other | |||||
| 主題 | 関西大学 | |||||
| キーワード | ||||||
| 主題Scheme | Other | |||||
| 主題 | Kansai University | |||||
