WEKO3
アイテム
落着の問題圏 : 無を巡って（一）
http://hdl.handle.net/10112/16218
http://hdl.handle.net/10112/16218ab4385e6-5d71-423c-8906-1adc81480a67
| 名前 / ファイル | ライセンス | アクション |
|---|---|---|
KU-0400-20030331-10.pdf (1.9 MB)
|
|
| Item type | 紀要論文 / Departmental Bulletin Paper(1) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 公開日 | 2018-07-30 | |||||
| タイトル | ||||||
| タイトル | 落着の問題圏 : 無を巡って（一） | |||||
| 言語 | ||||||
| 言語 | jpn | |||||
| 資源タイプ | ||||||
| 資源タイプ識別子 | http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 | |||||
| 資源タイプ | departmental bulletin paper | |||||
| その他のタイトル | ||||||
| その他のタイトル | A Sphere Where 'Gelassenheit' Comes into Question (Ⅱ) | |||||
| 著者 |
山本, 幾生
× 山本, 幾生 |
|||||
| 著者別名 | ||||||
| 識別子Scheme | WEKO | |||||
| 識別子 | 4059 | |||||
| 姓名 | Yamamoto, Ikuo | |||||
| 概要 | ||||||
| 内容記述タイプ | Other | |||||
| 内容記述 | In my previous paper, the sphere where 'Gelassenheit' comes into question was discussed from the viewpoint of freedom. In this paper, it is discussed from the viewpoint of nothingness, especially as discussed by Schopenhauer, and negation of will. Furthermore, the subject of the discussion is the mode of thought on nothingness, rather than the nothingness itself. It is intended to lead to how the 'Gelassenheit' should be. First, it is made clear that Schopenhauer critically studied Kant's classification of 'nihil privativum' and 'nihil negativum' and, by doing so, subsumed them as relative nothingness, and also that he thought about relative nothingness as negation of cognition, not as nothingness of the object (emptiness). At the same time, it is suggested that his negation of will is positioned in the activity where the will itself has the self-recognition through the world as the idea. These two points further lead to the following conclusion in this paper. That is, Schopenhauer's mode of thought on nothingness is not the same as that of Kant in which nothingness is regarded as empty, or as that of the German Idealism which leads to the Absolute. Rather, Schopenhauer thought about the 'Gelassenheit' of the sage while remaining in the position of the relativeness of cognition through discussing the objectification and negation of will in itself. | |||||
| 書誌情報 |
関西大学東西学術研究所紀要 巻 36, p. A49-A70, 発行日 2003-03-31 |
|||||
| ISSN | ||||||
| 収録物識別子タイプ | ISSN | |||||
| 収録物識別子 | 02878151 | |||||
| 書誌レコードID | ||||||
| 収録物識別子タイプ | NCID | |||||
| 収録物識別子 | AN0004709X | |||||
| 著者版フラグ | ||||||
| 出版タイプ | VoR | |||||
| 出版タイプResource | http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85 | |||||
| 出版者 | ||||||
| 出版者 | 関西大学東西学術研究所 | |||||
| キーワード | ||||||
| 主題Scheme | Other | |||||
| 主題 | 関西大学 | |||||
| キーワード | ||||||
| 主題Scheme | Other | |||||
| 主題 | Kansai University | |||||
