@article{oai:kansai-u.repo.nii.ac.jp:00015967,
 author = {吾妻, 重二},
 journal = {東アジア文化交渉研究 = Journal of East Asian cultural interaction studies},
 month = {Mar},
 note = {The concept of "Three bonds and Five rules (San gang Wu chang)" is often criticized in modern society as one of the greatest evils of Confucianism or Zhuxi's thought. In particular, "Three bonds" has been thought to make ruler a rope for subject, father a rope for child, and husband a rope for wife." This interpretation that the subordinates must "subject absolutely" to the superior is now widely seen and it seems to have been a common view in East Asia. However, after carefully reviewing the materials, we can see "Three bonds and Five Constant virtues" was not such an authoritative and repressive teaching. In this paper I would like to reexamine the meaning of "Three bonds and Five Constant virtues" and reconsider the traditional meaning of Zhuxi's thought., 中谷伸生教授古稀記念号},
 pages = {307--324},
 title = {朱子学再考 : 「三綱五常」をめぐって},
 volume = {13},
 year = {2020}
}