@article{oai:kansai-u.repo.nii.ac.jp:00010342,
 author = {根之木, 朋貴},
 journal = {関西大学外国語教育フォーラム},
 month = {Mar},
 note = {This paper focuses on how the phenomenon of the split questions (henceforth, SQ) seen by (1) should be analyzed as a comprehensive derivation process.
(1) ‘What tree did Juan plant, an oak?’ (Arregi 2010. 540)
First, we find that wh-part (what tree) is followed by tag (an oak?) as illustrated the in (1),
and divide the answer portion of SQ into four types as a category and we classify into a total
SQ-Type1 (DP), SQ-type2 (vP), SQ-type3 (PP, AP), SQ-type4 (CP) and so on.
In the following second article, we examine the previous studies about SQ, or
Camacho(2002) Arregi (2010) and López-Cortina (2007), and point out that unsolvable
problems are seen by these analysis.
In order to solve the problems in these analyses, I would like to propose Sharing
Confirmation (SC) analysis that can newly explain SQ phenomena comprehensively in this
paper. Concretely, we develop the alternative analysis that connected Arregi &Centeno
(2004)’s original concept sharing with confirmation phrase formation.
Moreover, since it is argued that the interrogative What in (1) is in fact an WH-expletive
which is differing from the usual interrogative sentence, we can account for many properties
which are not covered in other analysis., 研究論文},
 pages = {63--86},
 title = {分離疑問文（Split Questions）のSC 分析},
 volume = {12},
 year = {2013}
}