WEKO3
アイテム
Comparing frequency and Trueness Scale Descriptors in a Likert Scale Questionnaire on Language Learning Strategies
http://hdl.handle.net/10112/4497
http://hdl.handle.net/10112/449735cfb5c5-0c6b-4e9e-b39e-230ffc850195
| 名前 / ファイル | ライセンス | アクション |
|---|---|---|
KU-1100-20090000-01.pdf (2.5 MB)
|
|
| Item type | 学術雑誌論文 / Journal Article(1) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 公開日 | 2011-06-29 | |||||
| タイトル | ||||||
| タイトル | Comparing frequency and Trueness Scale Descriptors in a Likert Scale Questionnaire on Language Learning Strategies | |||||
| 言語 | en | |||||
| 言語 | ||||||
| 言語 | eng | |||||
| 資源タイプ | ||||||
| 資源タイプ識別子 | http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 | |||||
| 資源タイプ | journal article | |||||
| 著者 |
水本, 篤
× 水本, 篤× 竹内, 理 |
|||||
| 概要 | ||||||
| 内容記述タイプ | Other | |||||
| 内容記述 | This paper reports on the comparison of two types of scale descriptors in a questionnaire on language learning strategies.The main purpose of this study was to investigate which type of the two scale descriptors,frequency-based or trueness-based,is better for language learning strategy research. With a few weeks' interval,a questionnaire on learning strategies was administered to 408 EFL learner twice with frequency-based scale descriptors and trueness-based scale descriptors alternately. First, mean differences in the responses obtained from the two different scale descriptors were examined.Second,confirmatory factor analysis was applied to see which scale descriptor of the two shows better fit to the hypothesized model. Finally,equidistance between the categories was checked. Results show that trueness-based scale descriptors elicited slightly higher mean values of responses, which resulted in a better fit to the model. The distances between the categories were almost identical for both scale descriptors.The findings of the current study partially provide supportive evidence for the claim made by Dornyei and his colleagues that trueness-based scale descriptors are preferable to frequency-based counterparts in a questionnaire on learning.But they also show that the latter descriptors are not totally “flawed” as was claimed. |
|||||
| 書誌情報 |
ja : 日本言語テスト学会研究紀要 = JLTA Journal 巻 12, p. 116-136, 発行日 2009 |
|||||
| DOI | ||||||
| 関連タイプ | isIdenticalTo | |||||
| 識別子タイプ | DOI | |||||
| 関連識別子 | 10.20622/jltaj.12.0_116 | |||||
| 著者版フラグ | ||||||
| 出版タイプ | VoR | |||||
| 出版タイプResource | http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85 | |||||
| 出版者 | ||||||
| 出版者 | 日本言語テスト学会 | |||||
