{"created":"2023-05-15T12:19:45.930943+00:00","id":10132,"links":{},"metadata":{"_buckets":{"deposit":"2efab092-8498-4d61-8690-eb5e0cb7bfa5"},"_deposit":{"created_by":1,"id":"10132","owners":[1],"pid":{"revision_id":0,"type":"depid","value":"10132"},"status":"published"},"_oai":{"id":"oai:kansai-u.repo.nii.ac.jp:00010132","sets":["528:1455:1459"]},"author_link":["20656"],"control_number":"10132","item_9_alternative_title_20":{"attribute_name":"その他のタイトル","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_alternative_title":"Types of Evaluation by Raters and Reliability in an English Essay","subitem_alternative_title_language":"en"}]},"item_9_biblio_info_7":{"attribute_name":"書誌情報","attribute_value_mlt":[{"bibliographicIssueDates":{"bibliographicIssueDate":"2008","bibliographicIssueDateType":"Issued"},"bibliographicPageEnd":"49","bibliographicPageStart":"43","bibliographic_titles":[{"bibliographic_title":"統計数理研究所共同研究リポート215　「学習者コーパスの解析に基づく客観的作文評価指標の検討」","bibliographic_titleLang":"ja"}]}]},"item_9_description_4":{"attribute_name":"概要","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_description":"本研究では，自由英作文（エッセイ）の評価方法である，総合的評価（holistic rating）と分析的評価（analytic rating）の2種類の内部構造の関係を明らかにし，どちらか一方が他方より優れているのかという点について調査した。また，一般化可能性理論（Generalizability Theory）を利用することにより，測定における誤差の要因，一般化可能性係数，および評価尺度の項目数と評価者人数の検討を行った。結果として，総合的評価・分析的評価のどちらの尺度でもかなりの信頼性が確保できることがわかった。また，一般化可能性理論を用いることにより，誤差の要因の特定や，項目数や採点者数の検討を行い，評価の改善が可能になることを実証した。","subitem_description_type":"Other"},{"subitem_description":"In this study, a comparison of two common types of rating methods of the essay\ntest, holistic rating and analytic rating, was made in order to clarify which type of rating methods works better. First, the internal constitution of these two rating methods was explored by examining the intercorrelation of the scores of the holistic rating scale and those of each item in the analytic rating scale. Next, variance components and generalizability coefficient were estimated utilizing Generalizability theory, and thus simulating the number\nof items and rates necessary for reliable measurement. The results indicate that both rating methods function equally well in terms of reliability. Furthermore, it was confirmed that improvement of measurement would be possible with Generalizability theory.","subitem_description_type":"Other"}]},"item_9_publisher_34":{"attribute_name":"出版者","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_publisher":"統計数理研究所","subitem_publisher_language":"ja"}]},"item_9_version_type_17":{"attribute_name":"著者版フラグ","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_version_resource":"http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85","subitem_version_type":"VoR"}]},"item_creator":{"attribute_name":"著者","attribute_type":"creator","attribute_value_mlt":[{"creatorNames":[{"creatorName":"水本, 篤","creatorNameLang":"ja"},{"creatorName":"Mizumoto, Atsushi","creatorNameLang":"en"}],"nameIdentifiers":[{},{},{}]}]},"item_files":{"attribute_name":"ファイル情報","attribute_type":"file","attribute_value_mlt":[{"accessrole":"open_date","date":[{"dateType":"Available","dateValue":"2019-05-22"}],"displaytype":"detail","filename":"KU-1100-20080000-01.pdf","filesize":[{"value":"206.3 kB"}],"format":"application/pdf","licensetype":"license_note","mimetype":"application/pdf","url":{"label":"KU-1100-20080000-01.pdf","url":"https://kansai-u.repo.nii.ac.jp/record/10132/files/KU-1100-20080000-01.pdf"},"version_id":"1f71652a-93ee-4a9c-a596-67dbe2af2e7a"}]},"item_keyword":{"attribute_name":"キーワード","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_subject":"自由英作文","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"総合的評価","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"分析的評価","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"一般化可能性理論","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"関西大学","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"English essay","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"Holistic scoring","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"Analytic scoring","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"Generalizability Theory","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"Kansai University","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"}]},"item_language":{"attribute_name":"言語","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_language":"jpn"}]},"item_resource_type":{"attribute_name":"資源タイプ","attribute_value_mlt":[{"resourcetype":"journal article","resourceuri":"http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501"}]},"item_title":"自由英作文における評定者評価の種類と信頼性","item_titles":{"attribute_name":"タイトル","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_title":"自由英作文における評定者評価の種類と信頼性","subitem_title_language":"ja"}]},"item_type_id":"9","owner":"1","path":["1459"],"pubdate":{"attribute_name":"PubDate","attribute_value":"2018-03-05"},"publish_date":"2018-03-05","publish_status":"0","recid":"10132","relation_version_is_last":true,"title":["自由英作文における評定者評価の種類と信頼性"],"weko_creator_id":"1","weko_shared_id":-1},"updated":"2023-10-30T04:50:27.177084+00:00"}